| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.3 MB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Aims: This poster aims to compare retention rates of Universal Adhesive (UA) Brands in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) restorations and, to evaluate their functional survival by adhesion modes, Etch-and- Rinse (ER), Self-Etch (SE) and Selective Enamel Etching (SEE).
Material & methods: A Systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web-of-Science and B-on for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between 2015-2025.
Results: Of 251 screened records, 21 RCTs were eligible, comprising 16 UA brands with overall similar retention rates (p>0.05), median follow-up of 24-month (IQR 24-36 months).
Conclusions: UA brands applied by ER and SEE adhesion modes confirmed a decisive impact on long-term retention though, no UA brand can yet be considered as gold-standard for retention survival over 18th-48th month.
Descrição
Autor correspondente: Patrícia Manarte-Monteiro
Palavras-chave
Universal adhesives Multimode adhesive Dental bonding Non-carious cervical lesion (NCCLs) FDI criteria USPHS criteria Randomized clinical trial (RCT) Retention
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Manarte-Monteiro, P., D’Elia, L., Gavinha, S., Costa, L., & Silva, L. (2026, maio 7–9). Universal adhesive brands functional performance and survival: 18 to 48 months systematic report [Apresentação de poster]. AIC 27th Annual Congress & ConsEURO, Bolonha, Itália