Loading...
Publication
Restaurações posteriores diretas versus indiretas em resina composta: revisão narrativa
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPG_34016 | 494.55 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Devido a uma demanda crescente por restaurações estéticas, os compósitos ganharam um papel
de destaque na reabilitação direta de dentes posteriores. No entanto, o aparecimento de
materiais restauradores modernos, permitiu o desenvolvimento de técnicas de restauração
indireta.
Tradicionalmente, a escolha entre o uso de técnicas direta ou indireta para resinas compostas
em dentes posteriores é baseada no tamanho da cavidade a ser restaurada.
A manipulação correta do material e adequada seleção da técnica podem ser considerados como
os principais fatores que afetam o sucesso ou a falha na restauração.
Nesta revisão bibliográfica pretende-se verificar, através da análise de literatura as diferenças
entre as restaurações parciais diretas e indiretas em dentes posteriores abordado as técnicas,
indicações bem como as suas vantagens e desvantagens e o tipo de materiais utilizados para
este tipo de restaurações. Foi feita uma pesquisa bibliográfica nas bases de dados
PubMed/Medline entre os anos de 2008 e 2020.
Due to an increasing demand for aesthetic restorations, composites have gained a prominent role in the direct rehabilitation of posterior teeth. However, the appearance of modern restorative materials has enabled the development of indirect restoration techniques. Traditionally, the choice between using direct or indirect techniques for composite resins on posterior teeth is based on the size of the cavity to be restored. Correct handling of the material and proper selection of the technique can be considered asthe main factors that affect the success or failure of the restoration. This bibliographic review intends to verify, through the literature analysis, the differences between direct and indirect partial restorations in posterior teeth, approaching the techniques, indications as well as their advantages and disadvantages and the type of materials used for this type of restorations. A bibliographic search was carried out in the PubMed / Medline databases between the years 2008 and 2020.
Due to an increasing demand for aesthetic restorations, composites have gained a prominent role in the direct rehabilitation of posterior teeth. However, the appearance of modern restorative materials has enabled the development of indirect restoration techniques. Traditionally, the choice between using direct or indirect techniques for composite resins on posterior teeth is based on the size of the cavity to be restored. Correct handling of the material and proper selection of the technique can be considered asthe main factors that affect the success or failure of the restoration. This bibliographic review intends to verify, through the literature analysis, the differences between direct and indirect partial restorations in posterior teeth, approaching the techniques, indications as well as their advantages and disadvantages and the type of materials used for this type of restorations. A bibliographic search was carried out in the PubMed / Medline databases between the years 2008 and 2020.
Description
Keywords
Restaurações parciais posteriores Restaurações diretas Restaurações indiretas Compósito Inlay Onlay Amalgama Posterior partial restorations Direct restorations Indirect restorations Composite Inlay Onlay Amalgam