Loading...
Publication
Comparação do tratamento ortodôntico convencional com o tratamento por alinhadores: revisão narrativa
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Projeto de pós-graduação_39027 | 495.65 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objetivo: Este trabalho visa comparar os tratamentos ortodônticos convencionais com os dos alinhadores transparentes, na correção das más oclusões. A revisão foi baseada em estudos publicados nos últimos dez anos, extraídos das bases de dados PubMed, Cochrane Library e Lilacs. Estudos envolvendo pacientes com anomalias craniofaciais ou que tinham recebido tratamento ortodôntico foram excluídos. As palavras-chave utilizadas foram “ortodontia convencional”, “alinhadores transparentes”, “eficácia” e “más-oclusões”.
Metodologia: Uma revisão da literatura foi realizada para avaliar e comparar os resultados das duas abordagens terapêuticas. Os artigos foram selecionados de acordo com os critérios de inclusão e exclusão.
Resultados: Os alinhadores transparentes oferecem vantagens similares aos métodos convencionais em determinados tipos de más oclusões, proporcionando maior estética e conforto para os pacientes. No entanto, a sua eficácia depende do grau de cooperação do paciente.
Conclusão: Este estudo, ao efetuar uma análise comparativa dos tratamentos ortodônticos convencionais e dos alinhadores transparentes, facilita a escolha do tratamento ortodôntico com base na eficácia, conforto e preferências estéticas dos pacientes.
Objective: This study aims to compare the conventional orthodontic treatments with that of transparent aligners for correcting malocclusions. The review was based on studies published in the last ten years, extracted from the PubMed, Cochrane Library and Lilacs databases. Studies involving patients with craniofacial anomalies or who had received previous orthodontic treatment were excluded. The keywords used were “conventional orthodontics”, “clear aligners”, “efficacy” and “malocclusion”. Methodology: A literature review was carried out to evaluate and compare the results of the two therapeutic approaches. Articles were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Transparent aligners offer similar advantages to conventional methods in certain types of malocclusions, providing benefits such as greater aesthetics and comfort for patients. However, their effectiveness depends on the degree of patient compliance. Conclusion: This study provides a comparative analysis of conventional orthodontic treatments and transparent aligners, guiding the choice of treatment based on effectiveness, comfort and patient aesthetic preferences.
Objective: This study aims to compare the conventional orthodontic treatments with that of transparent aligners for correcting malocclusions. The review was based on studies published in the last ten years, extracted from the PubMed, Cochrane Library and Lilacs databases. Studies involving patients with craniofacial anomalies or who had received previous orthodontic treatment were excluded. The keywords used were “conventional orthodontics”, “clear aligners”, “efficacy” and “malocclusion”. Methodology: A literature review was carried out to evaluate and compare the results of the two therapeutic approaches. Articles were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Transparent aligners offer similar advantages to conventional methods in certain types of malocclusions, providing benefits such as greater aesthetics and comfort for patients. However, their effectiveness depends on the degree of patient compliance. Conclusion: This study provides a comparative analysis of conventional orthodontic treatments and transparent aligners, guiding the choice of treatment based on effectiveness, comfort and patient aesthetic preferences.
Description
Keywords
Tratamento ortodôntico convencional Alinhadores transparentes Eficácia Má oclusão Conventional orthodontic treatment Aligners Effectiveness Malocclusion