Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
306.87 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Recent publications have questioned the appropriateness of the chemiosmotic theory, a key tenet of
modern bioenergetics originally described by Mitchell and since widely improved upon and
applied. In one of them, application of Gauss’ law to a model charge distribution in mitochondria
was argued to refute the possibility of ATP generation through H+
movement in the absence of a
counterion, whereas a different author advocated, for other reasons, the impossibility of
chemiosmosis and proposed that a novel energy-generation scheme (referred to as “murburn”)
relying on superoxide-catalyzed (or superoxide-promoted) ADP phosphorylation would operate
instead. In this letter, those proposals are critically examined and found to be inconsistent with
established experimental data and new theoretical calculations.
Description
Keywords
Bioenergetics Chemiosmosis Gauss’s law Proton-motive force
Citation
Publisher
Elsevier