Loading...
Publication
Comparação entre os efeitos do tratamento em solo e em água após AVE: uma revisão bibliográfica
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27295 | 474.49 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objectivo: Compreender as diferenças entre os efeitos do tratamento em solo e em água após o AVE, ficando, assim, a conhecer o papel da hidroterapia no paciente com AVE. Metodologia: Pesquisa computorizada nas bases de dados e motores de busca PEDro, EBSCO, B-on, Google Scholar, Pubmed e Scielo para identificar artigos randomizados controlados que avaliassem, essencialmente, o papel da hidroterapia no paciente após AVE. Foram incluídos 5 artigos com uma pontuação média de 6,4 em 10 possíveis na escala de PEDro. Resultados: Nesses estudos participaram como objecto de estudo, no total, 125 indivíduos. Dois artigos comparam a reabilitação no solo com a reabilitação na água enquanto outros dois comparam a reabilitação no solo com a reabilitação no solo e na água, ao mesmo tempo. Apenas um artigo investiga a reabilitação na água comparando com ausência de reabilitação. Conclusão: A hidroterapia inibe a espasticidade, promove a mobilidade, aumenta o equilíbrio e a força e melhora a capacidade de marcha e é um tratamento eficaz quando queremos reabilitar um paciente com AVE.
Objective: To understand the differences between effects of treatment in land and in water after stroke and understand the role of hydrotherapy in patients after a stroke. Methodology: Computerized search in PEDro, EBSCO, B-on, Google Scholar, Pubmed and Scielo to identify randomized controlled trials to assess essentially the role of hydrotherapy in patients after a stroke. 5 Articles were included with an average score of 6.4 on a 10 possible in the PEDro scale. Results: In these studies participated in a total of 125 individuals. Two articles compare rehabilitation in land with rehabilitation in water while two articles compare the rehabilitation in land with rehabilitation in land and in water, at the same time, and only one article investigates the rehabilitation in water compared to the absence of rehabilitation. Conclusion: The hydrotherapy inhibits spasticity, promotes mobility, increases the balance and strength and enhances the gait ability and is an effective treatment when we want to rehabilitate a patient with stroke.
Objective: To understand the differences between effects of treatment in land and in water after stroke and understand the role of hydrotherapy in patients after a stroke. Methodology: Computerized search in PEDro, EBSCO, B-on, Google Scholar, Pubmed and Scielo to identify randomized controlled trials to assess essentially the role of hydrotherapy in patients after a stroke. 5 Articles were included with an average score of 6.4 on a 10 possible in the PEDro scale. Results: In these studies participated in a total of 125 individuals. Two articles compare rehabilitation in land with rehabilitation in water while two articles compare the rehabilitation in land with rehabilitation in land and in water, at the same time, and only one article investigates the rehabilitation in water compared to the absence of rehabilitation. Conclusion: The hydrotherapy inhibits spasticity, promotes mobility, increases the balance and strength and enhances the gait ability and is an effective treatment when we want to rehabilitate a patient with stroke.
Description
Projeto de Graduação apresentado à Universidade Fernando Pessoa como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do grau de Licenciada em Fisioterapia
Keywords
Hidroterapia Terapia aquática Função Funcionalidade AVE Reabilitação Fisioterapia Qualidade de vida ERC Hydrotherapy Aquatic therapy Function Functionality Stroke Rehabilitation Physiotherapy Quality of life RCT