Loading...
Publication
Prevalência do uso de sistemas de sedação consciente em medicina dentária, na prática clínica
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Projeto de pós-graduação_40921 | 1.04 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
O objetivo principal deste estudo é explorar e compreender o uso das técnicas de sedação consciente pelos médicos dentistas. Isso inclui uma análise detalhada das suas práticas clínicas, experiências e opiniões, coletadas através de um questionário. O estudo visa oferecer uma visão detalhada da aplicação dessas técnicas, identificando os fatores que influenciam sua adoção, eficácia e as barreiras enfrentadas pelos profissionais na implementação eficaz dessas técnicas em sua prática.
Métodos: A coleta de dados foi realizada através de um questionário previamente estruturado. Dividido em seis partes, incluiu 21 perguntas, abordando consentimento, dados demográficos, conhecimento e experiência com sedação consciente, razões para a não utilização e comentários adicionais. O estudo ocorreu entre janeiro e abril de 2024, com 123 participantes.
Resultados: Apenas 26% da amostra utilizava as técnicas de sedação consciente. A universidade foi identificada como a fonte de informação mais significativa (69,9%). Entre os utilizadores, 75% relataram um impacto positivo na prática clínica. Efeitos colaterais, como tonturas e náuseas, foram reportados por 31,4%, enquanto 68,6% não observaram efeitos significativos. 43,8% dos médicos dentistas não se sentiam preparados para utilizar essas técnicas.
Conclusões: A adoção da sedação consciente é limitada, destacando-se a importância da formação contínua. A sedação inalatória com protóxido de azoto é a mais preferida. Incentivos financeiros, diretrizes claras e educação dos pacientes são fundamentais para aumentar a aceitação e utilização destas técnicas.
The main objective of this study is to explore and understand the use of conscious sedation techniques by dentists. This includes a detailed analysis of their clinical practices, experiences, and opinions, collected through a questionnaire. The study aims to provide a detailed view of the application of these techniques, identifying the factors that influence their adoption, efficacy, and the barriers faced by professionals in the effective implementation of these techniques in their practice. Methods: Data collection was carried out through a pre-structured questionnaire divided into six parts with 21 questions. The study took place from January to April 2024 and included 123 participants. Results: Despite the extensive literature on the efficacy and dissemination of conscious sedation, only 26% of participants used these techniques. Universities were the most significant source of knowledge (69.9%). Among users, 75% reported a positive impact, and 31.4% experienced side effects such as dizziness and nausea, while 68.6% reported none. 43.8% did not feel adequately prepared to use sedation techniques. Conclusions: The adoption of conscious sedation in dentistry is limited, reinforcing the need for continued education. Inhalation sedation with nitrous oxide is the most preferred method. Financial incentives, clearer guidelines, and patient education are essential to increase acceptance and implementation of these techniques.
The main objective of this study is to explore and understand the use of conscious sedation techniques by dentists. This includes a detailed analysis of their clinical practices, experiences, and opinions, collected through a questionnaire. The study aims to provide a detailed view of the application of these techniques, identifying the factors that influence their adoption, efficacy, and the barriers faced by professionals in the effective implementation of these techniques in their practice. Methods: Data collection was carried out through a pre-structured questionnaire divided into six parts with 21 questions. The study took place from January to April 2024 and included 123 participants. Results: Despite the extensive literature on the efficacy and dissemination of conscious sedation, only 26% of participants used these techniques. Universities were the most significant source of knowledge (69.9%). Among users, 75% reported a positive impact, and 31.4% experienced side effects such as dizziness and nausea, while 68.6% reported none. 43.8% did not feel adequately prepared to use sedation techniques. Conclusions: The adoption of conscious sedation in dentistry is limited, reinforcing the need for continued education. Inhalation sedation with nitrous oxide is the most preferred method. Financial incentives, clearer guidelines, and patient education are essential to increase acceptance and implementation of these techniques.
Description
Keywords
Sedação consciente Sedação Odontologia Benzodiazepinas