Loading...
Publication
Efeito do tempo de alongamento na flexibilidade dos isquiotibais
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30155 | 309.84 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Introdução: Para que o alongamento seja eficaz, este irá depender de vários factores, sendo eles a duração, frequência e número de repetições. No entanto, não existe na literatura, concordância quanto ao tempo de alongamento mais eficaz. Objetivo: verificar o efeito dos diferentes tempos de alongamento na flexibilidade e limiar de sensibilidade à dor (LSD) dos isquiotibais. Metodologia: Foram divididos 21 indivíduos aleatoriamente por 3 grupos: grupo de controlo (G.C), grupos exerimentais 4 séries de 1 repetição de 30s (A30) e 60s (A60s) durante 4 semanas. Foi utilizado para avaliação da flexibildiade dos isquiotibiais o 90/90 Flexibility Test e o LSD, por algometria. Resultados: Existem aumentos na flexibilidade do grupo A60 face ao G.C e existem diferença na flexibilidade e LSD entre o G.C e os grupos A30 e A60 entre o membro dominante e não-dominante. Conclusão: Apenas o alongamento de 60s resultou num aumento da flexibilidade e existem diferenças na flexibilidade e LSD com o alongamento de 30 e 60s quando comparado o membro dominante e não-dominante.
Introduction: For the stretch to be efficient, it will depend on several factors, like the duration, frequency and number of repetitons. However there isn’t in the literature, an agreement over the time of stretching that is more effective. Objective: To verify the effects of different stretching times on the flexibility and pain treshold (PT) of the hamstrings. Methodology: Twenty-one individuals were randomly divided by 3 groups: control group (G.C) and experimental groups, 4 series of 1 repetiton of 30s (A30) and 60s (A60) during 4 weeks. The hamstrings 90/90 flexibility test was used to evaluate flexibility and the algometer for PT. Results: There is an increase of flexibility in the group A60 in comparasion to the G.C and there are diffferences in flexibility and PT in the A30 and A60 groups between the dominant and non-dominant limbs. Conclusion: Only the 60s stretching resulted in an increase in flexibility and there are differences in flexibility and PT with both stretch of 30s and 60s when comparing the dominant and non-dominant limb.
Introduction: For the stretch to be efficient, it will depend on several factors, like the duration, frequency and number of repetitons. However there isn’t in the literature, an agreement over the time of stretching that is more effective. Objective: To verify the effects of different stretching times on the flexibility and pain treshold (PT) of the hamstrings. Methodology: Twenty-one individuals were randomly divided by 3 groups: control group (G.C) and experimental groups, 4 series of 1 repetiton of 30s (A30) and 60s (A60) during 4 weeks. The hamstrings 90/90 flexibility test was used to evaluate flexibility and the algometer for PT. Results: There is an increase of flexibility in the group A60 in comparasion to the G.C and there are diffferences in flexibility and PT in the A30 and A60 groups between the dominant and non-dominant limbs. Conclusion: Only the 60s stretching resulted in an increase in flexibility and there are differences in flexibility and PT with both stretch of 30s and 60s when comparing the dominant and non-dominant limb.
Description
Projeto de Graduação apresentado à Universidade Fernando Pessoa como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do grau de Licenciada em Fisioterapia
Keywords
Flexibilidade Alongamento Tempos de alongamento Flexibility Stretching Stretching time