Loading...
Publication
Impressão convencional versus impressão digital em prótese fixa dento-suportada: uma revisão narrativa
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39645 | 369.91 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objetivo: A presente revisão tem como objetivo comparar as duas técnicas de impressão em medicina dentária: convencional e digital. Materiais e Métodos: Foi desenvolvida uma pesquisa da literatura, com recurso às bases de dados PubMed, B-On e Science Direct no período compreendido entre 1980 e abril de 2023. Esta pesquisa foi submetida a critérios de inclusão e exclusão e dos 78 artigos selecionados pelo título, 40 foram selecionados pela leitura do texto integral. Resultados: Foram comparados estudos relativos à exatidão no espaço marginal, à preferência do operador, à aceitação do paciente e à eficácia em termos de tempo, assim como facilidade de avaliação da qualidade da impressão final e facilidade na comunicação com o laboratório. A maioria dos estudos apresentou resultados iguais ou significativamente superiores na impressão digital. Conclusão: A superioridade da impressão digital em relação à impressão convencional foi observada na literatura escrutinada, no entanto ainda apresenta algumas limitações que serão ultrapassadas nos próximos anos.
Objective: The objective of this review is to compare the two dental impression techniques: conventional and digital. Materials and Methods: A literature search was carried out using the PubMed, B-On and Science Direct databases from 1980 to April 2023. This search was subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria and of the 78 articles selected by title, 40 were selected by reading the full text. Results: Studies were compared regarding marginal space accuracy, operator preference, patient acceptance and effectiveness in terms of time, ease of assessing the quality of the final impression and ease of communication with the laboratory. Most studies showed equal or significantly superior results for digital impressions. Conclusion: The superiority of digital impressions over conventional impressions has been observed in the literature reviewed, but there are still some limitations that will be overcome in the coming years.
Objective: The objective of this review is to compare the two dental impression techniques: conventional and digital. Materials and Methods: A literature search was carried out using the PubMed, B-On and Science Direct databases from 1980 to April 2023. This search was subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria and of the 78 articles selected by title, 40 were selected by reading the full text. Results: Studies were compared regarding marginal space accuracy, operator preference, patient acceptance and effectiveness in terms of time, ease of assessing the quality of the final impression and ease of communication with the laboratory. Most studies showed equal or significantly superior results for digital impressions. Conclusion: The superiority of digital impressions over conventional impressions has been observed in the literature reviewed, but there are still some limitations that will be overcome in the coming years.
Description
Keywords
Conventional impression Digital impression Dental impression techniques Tooth-supported fixed prosthesis Clinical efficiency Patient comfort Marginal fit Time work