Loading...
Publication
Sistemas de jato de ar no tratamento periodontal de suporte
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPG_33907 | 503.09 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objetivo: Avaliar se existem benefícios adicionais na utilização dos sistemas de jato de ar, face
ao tratamento convencional, durante a fase de manutenção periodontal.
Materiais e métodos: Realizou-se uma pesquisa bibliográfica na PubMed, para estudos
realizados em humanos, publicados nos últimos 20 anos. Foram incluídos revisões sistemáticas,
meta-análises e ensaios clínicos randomizados.
Resultados: Na fase de manutenção, os sistemas de polimento com jato de ar e pós de baixa
abrasividade apresentam uma eficácia clínica e microbiológica semelhante ao tratamento
convencional. Contudo, são mais confortáveis e requererem menos tempo de tratamento.
Conclusões: À luz das (limitadas) evidências atuais, os sistemas de polimento com jato de ar
podem ser considerados uma alternativa de tratamento na fase de suporte. São necessários mais
estudos de elevada qualidade e de longo termo para que se possam tecer recomendações
definitivas no que respeita à seleção de uma técnica em prol de outra.
Objective: Assess if there are additional benefits of using air polishing devices over conventional treatment during periodontal maintenance. Material and methods: Has been made a bibliographic review using the database Pubmed looking for studies made in humans and published in the last 20 years. It was included systematic reviews, meta-analysis and randomized clinical trials. Results: In the maintenance phase, low-abrasive air powder polishing systems have similar clinical and microbiological efficacy to conventional treatment. However, they are more comfortable and require less treatment time. Conclusions: In current (limited) evidence, air polishing devices can be considered as an alternative during periodontal maintenance. Further high quality and long term studies are needed before making any definitive recommendations on selecting one technique over another.
Objective: Assess if there are additional benefits of using air polishing devices over conventional treatment during periodontal maintenance. Material and methods: Has been made a bibliographic review using the database Pubmed looking for studies made in humans and published in the last 20 years. It was included systematic reviews, meta-analysis and randomized clinical trials. Results: In the maintenance phase, low-abrasive air powder polishing systems have similar clinical and microbiological efficacy to conventional treatment. However, they are more comfortable and require less treatment time. Conclusions: In current (limited) evidence, air polishing devices can be considered as an alternative during periodontal maintenance. Further high quality and long term studies are needed before making any definitive recommendations on selecting one technique over another.
Description
Keywords
Jato de ar Periodontal Manutenção Suporte Air polishing Periodontal Maintenance Supportive