A carregar...
Publicação
Taxas de sobrevivência de implantes imediatos: carga imediata versus carga diferida – revisão narrativa
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 382.54 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Objetivo: analisar e comparar os protocolos de carga imediata e carga diferida em implantes imediatos. E, com base nas suas taxas de sobrevivência, determinar qual o protocolo de carga mais adequado para a reabilitação oral com implantes imediatos.
Métodos: foi elaborada uma pesquisa bibliográfica, com recurso à base de dados informática PubMed e foram apenas incluídos artigos de revisão sistemática a comparar os resultados de ambos os protocolos de carga em implantes imediatos.
Resultados: foram obtidas e analisadas 5 revisões sistemáticas comparando implantes imediatos com carga imediata e implantes imediatos com carga diferida.
Conclusões: pouca é a literatura atualmente disponível que compara de forma efetiva os protocolos de carga imediata e carga diferida em implantes imediatos, bem como a sua influência nos resultados da reabilitação oral.
Objective: to analyze and compare the immediate loading and delayed loading protocols in immediate implants. And, based on the survival rates, determine which loading protocol is most suitable for oral rehabilitation with immediate implants. Methods: a review was performed using electronic database PubMed and only systematic review articles were included, comparing the results of both loading protocols in immediate implants. Results: five systematic reviews comparing immediate implants with immediate loading and immediate implants with delayed loading were obtained and analyzed. Conclusions: few is the literature currently available that effectively compares immediate loading and delayed loading protocols in immediate implants, as well as their influence on oral rehabilitation results.
Objective: to analyze and compare the immediate loading and delayed loading protocols in immediate implants. And, based on the survival rates, determine which loading protocol is most suitable for oral rehabilitation with immediate implants. Methods: a review was performed using electronic database PubMed and only systematic review articles were included, comparing the results of both loading protocols in immediate implants. Results: five systematic reviews comparing immediate implants with immediate loading and immediate implants with delayed loading were obtained and analyzed. Conclusions: few is the literature currently available that effectively compares immediate loading and delayed loading protocols in immediate implants, as well as their influence on oral rehabilitation results.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Immediate implant placement Loading Immediate loading Delayed loading