Loading...
Publication
Critérios para avaliação na seleção clínica das próteses aparafusadas e cimentadas
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPG_35027 | 423.36 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Os implantes estão cada vez mais presentes nas reabilitações orais, o que leva aos profissionais um minucioso critério na seleção clinica entre a escolha do sistema de retenção (cimentada ou parafusada), pois estas muitas vezes estão relacionadas com a preferência do profissional, sendo influenciada também pelo desejo de cada paciente. Estes sistemas de retenção apresentam alguns fatores que diferem-se entre eles, sendo de extrema importância ser levado em consideração no momento da seleção, dentre os quais são: oclusão e fratura da cerâmica, passividade, desaperto do parafuso, estética e reversibilidade. Tendo em vista estas questões, este trabalho tem como objetivo auxiliar o profissional no critério de seleção das próteses aparafusadas e cimentadas, através de uma revisão de literatura que aborda uma discussão sobre o critério para seleção clínica entre estas, enfatizando suas vantagens, desvantagens e limitações, referido nos seguintes aspectos como conhecimento e auxílio para seleção da prótese-sobre implante.
Implants are increasingly present in oral rehabilitations, which leads professionals to a careful criterion in the clinical selection between the choice of the retention system (cemented or screwed), since these are often related to the preference of the professional, being also influenced by the desire of each patient. These retention systems present some factors that differ between them, being of extreme importance to be taken into account at the moment of selection, among which are: occlusion and fracture of the ceramics, passivity, screw loosening, aesthetics and reversibility. In view of these issues, this study aims to assist the professional in the selection of bolted and cemented prostheses through a literature review that addresses a discussion about the criteria for clinical selection between these, emphasizing their advantages, disadvantages and limitations, referred to in the following aspects as knowledge and assistance for selection of the implant-over-implant.
Implants are increasingly present in oral rehabilitations, which leads professionals to a careful criterion in the clinical selection between the choice of the retention system (cemented or screwed), since these are often related to the preference of the professional, being also influenced by the desire of each patient. These retention systems present some factors that differ between them, being of extreme importance to be taken into account at the moment of selection, among which are: occlusion and fracture of the ceramics, passivity, screw loosening, aesthetics and reversibility. In view of these issues, this study aims to assist the professional in the selection of bolted and cemented prostheses through a literature review that addresses a discussion about the criteria for clinical selection between these, emphasizing their advantages, disadvantages and limitations, referred to in the following aspects as knowledge and assistance for selection of the implant-over-implant.
Description
Keywords
Próteses aparafusadas versus próteses cimentadas Implantes-dentários Biomecânica Estética Screwed prostheses versus cemented prostheses Dental implants Biomechanics Aesthetics