A carregar...
Publicação
Eficácia do rolo miofascial na fadiga após simulação de um jogo de basquetebol em atletas federadas
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 880.86 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Objetivo: comparar a eficácia da Auto-libertação Miofascial com rolo com a Recuperação Passiva na diminuição da fadiga e dor muscular após simulação de um jogo de basquetebol em atletas federadas do género feminino. Metodologia: dez atletas de basquetebol do género feminino pertencentes ao escalão sub-19 e sénior, com uma média de idade de 19,70±2,54 anos, foram submetidas a duas sessões de exercício e recuperação realizadas com 72 horas de intervalo. O protocolo de exercício para simulação de um jogo de basquetebol usado foi o Basketball Exercise Simulation Test (BEST). O tipo de recuperação foi diferente em cada sessão, determinado de forma aleatória. As atletas realizaram uma recuperação de 15 minutos, passiva ou com o rolo miofascial. Foram avaliadas a Frequência Cardíaca (FC), Perceção de Esforço através da Escala de Borg, Dor muscular através da Escala Numérica de Dor e Concentração de Lactato no sangue antes do BEST, 1 minuto após o BEST e 1 minuto após a recuperação nas duas sessões. Resultados: verificaram-se diferenças significativas após o BEST e após a recuperação em todas as variáveis nos dois tipos de recuperação. A exceção da Concentração de Lactato que aumentou significativamente após o BEST e diminuiu significativamente após a recuperação com rolo miofascial. Comparando as diferenças obtidas após o BEST, nos dois tipos de recuperação, não se verificaram diferenças significativas na Escala de Borg, Dor Muscular e Concentração de Lactato. Contudo, após a recuperação as diferenças entre as variáveis Escala de Borg e Dor muscular são significativas entre os dois tipos de recuperação. Conclusão: a menor Perceção de Esforço, Dor muscular e Concentração de Lactato indicam que a recuperação com rolo poderá ser mais eficaz relativamente à recuperação passiva.
Purpose: Compare the efficacy of Self-Myofascial Release with foam roller with Passive Recovery in reducing fatigue and muscle pain after simulating a basketball game in female federated athletes. Methods: Ten female basketball athletes belonging to the sub-19 and senior level, with an average age of 19,70±2,54 years, were submitted to two sessions of exercise and recovery performed with 72 hours of interval. The exercise protocol for simulating a basketball game was the Basketball Exercise Simulation Test (BEST). The type of recovery was different in each session, determined randomly. The athletes performed a 15-minute Passive Recovery or with the Foam Roller. Heart Rate (HR), Perceived Exertion through the Borg Scale, Muscular Pain through the Numerical Pain Scale and Blood Lactate Concentration were evaluated before BEST, 1 minute after BEST and 1 minute after recovery in both sessions. Results: Significant differences were observed after BEST and after recovery in all variables in both types of recovery. The exception was the Lactate Concentration that increased significantly after the BEST and decreased significantly after recovery with foam roller. Comparing the differences obtained after BEST, in both types of recovery, there were no significant differences in the Borg Scale, Muscular Pain and Lactate Concentration. However, after recovery the differences between the Borg Scale and Muscular Pain variables are significant between the two types of recovery. Conclusion: The smallest Perceived Exertion, Muscular Pain and Lactate Concentration indicate that the foam roller recovery may be more effective in relation to passive recovery.
Purpose: Compare the efficacy of Self-Myofascial Release with foam roller with Passive Recovery in reducing fatigue and muscle pain after simulating a basketball game in female federated athletes. Methods: Ten female basketball athletes belonging to the sub-19 and senior level, with an average age of 19,70±2,54 years, were submitted to two sessions of exercise and recovery performed with 72 hours of interval. The exercise protocol for simulating a basketball game was the Basketball Exercise Simulation Test (BEST). The type of recovery was different in each session, determined randomly. The athletes performed a 15-minute Passive Recovery or with the Foam Roller. Heart Rate (HR), Perceived Exertion through the Borg Scale, Muscular Pain through the Numerical Pain Scale and Blood Lactate Concentration were evaluated before BEST, 1 minute after BEST and 1 minute after recovery in both sessions. Results: Significant differences were observed after BEST and after recovery in all variables in both types of recovery. The exception was the Lactate Concentration that increased significantly after the BEST and decreased significantly after recovery with foam roller. Comparing the differences obtained after BEST, in both types of recovery, there were no significant differences in the Borg Scale, Muscular Pain and Lactate Concentration. However, after recovery the differences between the Borg Scale and Muscular Pain variables are significant between the two types of recovery. Conclusion: The smallest Perceived Exertion, Muscular Pain and Lactate Concentration indicate that the foam roller recovery may be more effective in relation to passive recovery.
Descrição
Projeto de Graduação apresentado à Universidade Fernando Pessoa como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do grau de Licenciada em Fisioterapia
Palavras-chave
Basquetebol Recuperação Rolo miofascial Fadiga Dor muscular Basketball Recovery Foam roller Fatigue Muscular pain