Loading...
Publication
Prevalência de complicações técnicas e biológicas na reabilitação implantosuportada em prótese aparafusada
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPG_33530 | 1.19 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objetivo: Analisar as complicações técnicas e biológicas na reabilitação em prótese implantosuportada aparafusada.
Métodos: Esta revisão bibliográfica foi elaborada, mediante a procura de publicações
científicas, com recurso às bases de dadosinformática PubMed (usando a MeSH). Esta pesquisa
foi sujeita à aplicação de critérios de inclusão e exclusão. Foram apenas incluídos artigos de
revisão, meta-análises e estudos, relacionados com complicações, características da Prótese
implanto-suportada aparafusada, comparando desta técnica com a cimentada.
Resultados: Analisaram-se 5 revisões sistemáticas, 1 meta-análise e 4 revisões sistemáticas
com meta-análise, comparando os dois tipos de retenção aparafusada e cimentada e as suas
complicações técnicas e biológicas. Os parâmetros clínicos observados foram descritos.
Conclusões: Após as conclusões obtidas podemos afirmar que a prótese implanto-suportada
aparafusada apresenta mais complicações técnicas e menos complicações biológicas.
Objectives: Analyze the technical and biological complications of rehabilitation in screw retained implant-supported prostheses. Methods: This bibliographic review was prepared using a search of scientific publications, using PubMed computer databases (using a MeSH). Thisresearch wassubject to the application of inclusion and exclusion. Only review articles, meta-analyzes and studies related to complications, characteristics of screw-retained implant-supported prosthesis, comparing this technique with cemented were included. Results: 5 systematic reviews, 1 meta-analysis and 4 systematic reviews with meta-analysis were analyzed, comparing the two types of screw-retained and cemented retention and their technical and biological complications. The observed clinical parameters were described. Conclusions: After the conclusions obtained, we can affirm that the screwed implant-supported prosthesis has more technical complications and less biological complications.
Objectives: Analyze the technical and biological complications of rehabilitation in screw retained implant-supported prostheses. Methods: This bibliographic review was prepared using a search of scientific publications, using PubMed computer databases (using a MeSH). Thisresearch wassubject to the application of inclusion and exclusion. Only review articles, meta-analyzes and studies related to complications, characteristics of screw-retained implant-supported prosthesis, comparing this technique with cemented were included. Results: 5 systematic reviews, 1 meta-analysis and 4 systematic reviews with meta-analysis were analyzed, comparing the two types of screw-retained and cemented retention and their technical and biological complications. The observed clinical parameters were described. Conclusions: After the conclusions obtained, we can affirm that the screwed implant-supported prosthesis has more technical complications and less biological complications.
Description
Keywords
Próteses e implantes Implantes dentários Parafusos ósseos Prótese dentária Suportados por implantes Retenção de próteses dentárias Falha na restauração dentária Pilares dentários Prostheses and implants Dental implants Bone screws Dental prosthesis Implant-supported Dental prosthesis retention Dental restoration failure Dental abutments