Loading...
Publication
Comparação da fiabilidade de impressões digitais e impressões convencionais em casos de reabilitações totais dentosuportadas: revisão narrativa
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37323 | 271.45 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objetivo: A impressão é um passo fundamental para a realização de uma prótese fixa dentosuportada bem-sucedida. O objetivo deste trabalho è comparar as impressões digitais e convencionais em relação à sua fiabilidade e com base nas diferentes técnicas utilizadas.
Metodologia: Foi efetuada uma pesquisa bibliográfica nas bases de dados eletrónicos: PubMed, Google Scholar e b-on para selecionar artigos científicos que avaliassem as diferenças entre os dois tipos de impressões e as técnicas utilizadas. Os termos pesquisados foram: "Materiais de Impressão Dentária", "Técnicas de Impressão Dentária", "Impressão Digital" entre outros. A pesquisa foi limitada a artigos científicos e revisões publicadas entre 2002 e 2021. Foram selecionadas 24 referências bibliográficas.
Resultados: Os resultados revelaram que, no que diz respeito às impressões em ‘full-arch’, o método convencional ainda é o ‘gold standard’ em termos de fiabilidade; enquanto, para impressões de dimensões que chegam até um quadrante, o método digital revelou-se ao mesmo nível das impressões convencionais e, em alguns casos, também mais valido.
Objective: Impression is a fundamental step towards the realization of a successful tooth- supported fixed prosthesis. The objective of this work is to compare digital and conventional prints in terms of their reliability and based on the different techniques used. Methodology: A bibliographic search was carried out in the electronic databases: PubMed, Google Scholar and b-on to select scientific articles that evaluated the differences between the two types of impressions and the techniques used. The search terms were: "Dental Printing Materials", "Dental Printing Techniques", "Digital Printing" among others. The search was limited to scientific articles and reviews published between 2002 and 2021. 24 bibliographic references were selected. Results: The results revealed that, with regard to 'full-arch' prints, the conventional method is still the 'gold standard' in terms of reliability; while, for prints with dimensions that reach up to one quadrant, the digital method proved to be at the same level as conventional prints and, in some cases, also more valid.
Objective: Impression is a fundamental step towards the realization of a successful tooth- supported fixed prosthesis. The objective of this work is to compare digital and conventional prints in terms of their reliability and based on the different techniques used. Methodology: A bibliographic search was carried out in the electronic databases: PubMed, Google Scholar and b-on to select scientific articles that evaluated the differences between the two types of impressions and the techniques used. The search terms were: "Dental Printing Materials", "Dental Printing Techniques", "Digital Printing" among others. The search was limited to scientific articles and reviews published between 2002 and 2021. 24 bibliographic references were selected. Results: The results revealed that, with regard to 'full-arch' prints, the conventional method is still the 'gold standard' in terms of reliability; while, for prints with dimensions that reach up to one quadrant, the digital method proved to be at the same level as conventional prints and, in some cases, also more valid.
Description
Keywords
Moldagens dentárias de arco completo Precisão da digitalização Materiais de moldagem dentária Técnica de moldagem dentária Scanner intraoral Dental full-arch impressions Scan accuracy Dental impression materials Dental impression technique Intraoral scanner