Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PG_33429 | 670.15 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objetivo: A finalidade deste estudo foi verificar os efeitos a curto prazo de um protocolo de exercícios isométricos para flexão crânio-cervical no ângulo crânio-vertebral. Metodologia: Vinte indivíduos foram recrutados e distribuídos aleatoriamente entre dois grupos. No grupo experimental (n=10 indivíduos) foi avaliado o ângulo crânio-vertebral 24h antes e após o protocolo. No primeiro dia o protocolo foi realizado na posição ortostática e no segundo dia em decúbito dorsal. A anteriorização da cabeça, expressa através do ângulo crânio-cervical foi avaliada com recurso a videografia e ao programa Kinovea. Resultados: Comparando intergrupos, não foram encontradas diferenças significativas na avaliação no ângulo crânio-vertebral. Já na comparação intragrupos, foi verificada uma diferença significativa no momento após o exercício entre 1º e o 2º dia, no grupo experimental. Conclusão: Os exercícios isométricos com biofeedback não tem um efeito significativo na anteriorização da cabeça nas 24 horas após a aplicação do protocolo quando comparado a um grupo de controlo.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to verify the short-term effects of an isometric exercise protocol for cranium-cervical flexion at the level of the cranium-vertebral angle. Methodology: Twenty individuals were recruited and randomly assigned in to two groups. In the experimental group (n=10 individuals) the cranium-vertebral angle was evaluated 24h later, before and after the protocol. In the first day the protocol was performed in the standing position and on the second day in the supine position. The forward head posture, expressed through the cranium-cervical angle, was evaluated using videography and the Kinovea program. Results: Comparing intergroups, no significant differences were found in the assessment of cranium-vertebral angle. In the intragroup comparison, there was a significant difference at the time after exercise between the 1st and 2nd day, in the experimental group. Conclusion: Isometric biofeedback exercises don’t have a significant effect on head anteriorization within 24 hours of protocol application when compared with a control group.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to verify the short-term effects of an isometric exercise protocol for cranium-cervical flexion at the level of the cranium-vertebral angle. Methodology: Twenty individuals were recruited and randomly assigned in to two groups. In the experimental group (n=10 individuals) the cranium-vertebral angle was evaluated 24h later, before and after the protocol. In the first day the protocol was performed in the standing position and on the second day in the supine position. The forward head posture, expressed through the cranium-cervical angle, was evaluated using videography and the Kinovea program. Results: Comparing intergroups, no significant differences were found in the assessment of cranium-vertebral angle. In the intragroup comparison, there was a significant difference at the time after exercise between the 1st and 2nd day, in the experimental group. Conclusion: Isometric biofeedback exercises don’t have a significant effect on head anteriorization within 24 hours of protocol application when compared with a control group.
Description
Projeto de Graduação apresentado à Universidade Fernando Pessoa como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do grau de Licenciada em Fisioterapia
Keywords
Anteriorização da cabeça Stabilizer Flexores cervicais profundos Biofeedback Forward head posture Stabilizer Deep cervical flexors Biofeedback