Loading...
Publication
MTA versus Biodentine™ na proteção pulpar direta e indireta: revisão narrativa
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39732 | 438.54 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A cárie dentária é uma doença crónica progressiva com elevada prevalência na população. As lesões de cárie profunda, por vezes, requerem a execução de procedimentos reabilitadores específicos (proteção pulpar direta ou indireta), visando a manutenção da vitalidade da peça dentária afetada. Os materiais dentários, com propriedades direcionadas à regeneração do complexo dentino-pulpar, mais comummente utilizados são o MTA e o Biodentine™.
Pretende-se com este trabalho de revisão elucidar a respeito das propriedades, indicações e características clínicas destes dois materiais regeneradores, procurando determinar qual o biomaterial com maior eficácia e sucesso clínico quando aplicado em casos de proteção pulpar direta ou indireta. Para isso, foi efetuada uma pesquisa bibliográfica em bases de dados online (B-On, PubMed/Medline, Science Direct).
Os resultados mostraram que ambos os biomateriais têm a capacidade de proporcionar a formação de pontes de dentina terciária, no entanto, o Biodentine™ aparenta apresentar melhores resultados clínicos e vantagens na sua utilização.
Dental caries is a chronic progressive disease with a high prevalence in the population. Deep caries lesions sometimes require specific rehabilitation procedures (direct or indirect pulp protection) to maintain the vitality of the affected tooth. The most commonly used dental materials with properties aimed at regenerating the dentin-pulp complex are MTA and Biodentine™. The aim of this review is to elucidate the properties, indications and clinical characteristics of these two regenerating materials, in an attempt to determine which biomaterial has the greatest efficacy and clinical success when applied in cases of direct or indirect pulp protection. To this end, a bibliographic search was carried out in online databases (B-On, PubMed/Medline, Science Direct). The results showed that both biomaterials have the ability to provide the formation of tertiary dentin bridges, however, Biodentine™ appears to present better clinical results and advantages in its use.
Dental caries is a chronic progressive disease with a high prevalence in the population. Deep caries lesions sometimes require specific rehabilitation procedures (direct or indirect pulp protection) to maintain the vitality of the affected tooth. The most commonly used dental materials with properties aimed at regenerating the dentin-pulp complex are MTA and Biodentine™. The aim of this review is to elucidate the properties, indications and clinical characteristics of these two regenerating materials, in an attempt to determine which biomaterial has the greatest efficacy and clinical success when applied in cases of direct or indirect pulp protection. To this end, a bibliographic search was carried out in online databases (B-On, PubMed/Medline, Science Direct). The results showed that both biomaterials have the ability to provide the formation of tertiary dentin bridges, however, Biodentine™ appears to present better clinical results and advantages in its use.
Description
Keywords
MTA Biodentine™ Capeamento pulpar direto Capeamento pulpar indireto Cárie dentária Materiais dentários Direct pulp capping Indirect pulp capping Dental caries Dental materials