Repository logo
 
Publication

Peri-implantite: prevalĂȘncia e problemas associados

datacite.subject.fosCiĂȘncias MĂ©dicas::Medicina ClĂ­nicapt_PT
dc.contributor.advisorOliveira, Hélder
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Maria da Conceição Pereira
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-05T17:05:11Z
dc.date.available2019-02-05T17:05:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-18
dc.description.abstractObjetivos: O objetivo deste trabalho de revisĂŁo bibliogrĂĄfica foi avaliar a prevalĂȘncia da peri-implantite, de acordo com a literatura atual, quais os critĂ©rios de anĂĄlise para a avaliar e quais os problemas relacionados com os diferentes critĂ©rios. MĂ©todos: Foi elaborada uma pesquisa bibliogrĂĄfica, com recurso Ă s bases de dados eletrĂłnicas da PubMed / Medline e B-On. Foram selecionadas revisĂ”es sistemĂĄticas e artigos, estritamente relacionados com o tema, para que pudessem ser comparadas com rigor cientĂ­fico as razĂ”es das diferentes prevalĂȘncias da peri-implantite na literatura. Resultados: ApĂłs anĂĄlise comparativa dos diferentes artigos, verificou-se que a prevalĂȘncia da peri-implantite se situa entre os valores de 8.9% a 47,1% a nĂ­vel mundial. ConclusĂ”es: Pode concluir-se que a discrepĂąncia entre os valores registados pelos diferentes autores, se deve, essencialmente, ao facto de nĂŁo se utilizarem igualdade de critĂ©rios na definição de peri-implantite e no limite de perda Ăłssea marginal. No futuro serĂĄ importante que todos os investigadores usem o critĂ©rio STROBE de forma uniforme.pt_PT
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this bibliographic review was to evaluate the prevalence of peri-implantitis, which are the evaluation criteria to evaluate and which are the associated problems related to the different criteria. Methods: A bibliographic research was carried out using PubMed / Medline and B-On databases from which articles and systematic reviews were extracted so that the reasons for the different peri-implantitis prevalence’s could be compared with scientific bases. Results: After a comparative analysis of the different articles, it was verified that the prevalence of peri-implantitis is between 8,9% and 47,1% worldwide. Conclusions: It can be concluded that this discrepancy between the values recorded by the different authors is essentially due to the fact that there are no clear definition criteria for peri-implantitis, as for the marginal bone loss. In the future it will be important for all researchers to use the uniform STROBE criterion.pt_PT
dc.identifier.tid202686809
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10284/7298
dc.language.isoporpt_PT
dc.subjectPeri-implantitispt_PT
dc.subjectPrevalencept_PT
dc.subjectPeri-implant diseasespt_PT
dc.titlePeri-implantite: prevalĂȘncia e problemas associadospt_PT
dc.typemaster thesis
dspace.entity.typePublication
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typemasterThesispt_PT
thesis.degree.nameMestrado Integrado em Medicina DentĂĄriapt_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PPG_30033.pdf
Size:
237.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: