Loading...
Publication
Comparação de métodos convencionais versus métodos digitais de impressão em prótese fixa: revisão narrativa
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 569.67 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
O avanço tecnológico verificado nas últimas décadas resultou numa profunda transformação dos fluxos de trabalho nos consultórios de medicina dentária. A toma de impressão tem sido uma prática comum na medicina dentária, em especial modo no campo da reabilitação oral, uma vez que um registo correto das preparações dentárias garantirá o sucesso do tratamento. Atualmente, o método convencional para impressões em prótese fixa é realizado através elastómeros, sendo que nas impressões com método digital o scanner intraoral vai ser cada vez mais utilizado. Este trabalho tem como objetivo realizar uma revisão bibliográfica narrativa abordando as duas técnicas de impressão, digital e convencional, enquadrando as novas tecnologias que tem surgido no tempo e compará-las com as convencionais, tendo em conta fatores como precisão e exatidão, tempo de consulta e preferência por parte do paciente, concluindo se há evidencias científicas que permitem comprovar as vantagens de uma técnica em relação a outra.
Technological advances in recent decades have resulted in a profound transformation of workflows in dental practices. Taking impressions has become a common practice in dentistry, especially in the field of oral rehabilitation, as a correct registration of dental preparations ensures treatment success. Currently, the conventional method for impressions in fixed prosthesis is made by elastomeric materials, and in the impressions with digital method the intraoral scanner will be increasingly used. The aim of this work is to carry out a narrative bibliographic review addressing the two impression techniques, digital and conventional, framing the new technologies that have emerged over time and comparing them with the conventional ones, considering factors such as precision and accuracy, consultation time and patient preference, concluding whether there is scientific evidence to prove the advantages of one technique over the other.
Technological advances in recent decades have resulted in a profound transformation of workflows in dental practices. Taking impressions has become a common practice in dentistry, especially in the field of oral rehabilitation, as a correct registration of dental preparations ensures treatment success. Currently, the conventional method for impressions in fixed prosthesis is made by elastomeric materials, and in the impressions with digital method the intraoral scanner will be increasingly used. The aim of this work is to carry out a narrative bibliographic review addressing the two impression techniques, digital and conventional, framing the new technologies that have emerged over time and comparing them with the conventional ones, considering factors such as precision and accuracy, consultation time and patient preference, concluding whether there is scientific evidence to prove the advantages of one technique over the other.
Description
Keywords
Conventional impression Digital impression Intra-oral scanner Dental impressions Impression materials Conventional impression Digital impression Intra-oral scanner Dental impressions Impression materials