| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPG_36961 | 393.24 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A reabilitação dental de pacientes parcialmente ou totalmente edêntulos
com implantes dentais tornou-se rotineira na lmplantologia. No entanto, as
reabilitações de maxilas atróficas podem ter um alto grau de complexidade,
fazendo-se necessárias cirurgias de enxerto para viabilizar a colocação de
implantes. O enxerto autógeno vem sendo apresentado como melhor material para
o levantamento de seio maxilar, por apresentar todas as propriedades desejáveis,
entretanto exibe algumas desvantagens, incluindo complicações do sítio doador,
estocagem e disponibilidade limitada. Grande parte da literatura tem sido favorável
aos substitutos ósseos, sendo de fácil esterilização e armazenagem, estando
disponível em quantidade ilimitada, podem ser utilizados isoladamente ou em
combinação com o osso autógeno ou outros materiais. Qual seria o biomaterial
capaz de agir como substituto ósseo, cujas propriedades biomecânicas e
osteogênicas sejam tão eficientes quanto as do enxerto ósseo autógeno? Por meio
de uma revisão bibliográfica, o objetivo dessa pesquisa é encontrar uma resposta à
questão.
Dental rehabilitation of partially or fully edentulous patients with dental implants have become a routine method in Implantology. However, the rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla may have a high degree of complexity, grafting surgery on the maxillary sinus are necessary to enable the implants placement.The autograft has been presented as the best material for the lifting of the maxillary sinus, to present all the desirable properties, however it displays some disadvantages, including complications of the donor site, storage and limited availability. Much literature has been favorable to bone substitutes, since they have easy sterilization and storage, and are available in unlimited quantity, may be used alone or in combination with autologous bone or other material. Which would be the biomaterial able to act as a bone substitute, whose biomechanical properties and osteogenic be as efficient as the autogenous bone graft? Through a bibliographic review, the objective of this research is to find an answer to the question.
Dental rehabilitation of partially or fully edentulous patients with dental implants have become a routine method in Implantology. However, the rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla may have a high degree of complexity, grafting surgery on the maxillary sinus are necessary to enable the implants placement.The autograft has been presented as the best material for the lifting of the maxillary sinus, to present all the desirable properties, however it displays some disadvantages, including complications of the donor site, storage and limited availability. Much literature has been favorable to bone substitutes, since they have easy sterilization and storage, and are available in unlimited quantity, may be used alone or in combination with autologous bone or other material. Which would be the biomaterial able to act as a bone substitute, whose biomechanical properties and osteogenic be as efficient as the autogenous bone graft? Through a bibliographic review, the objective of this research is to find an answer to the question.
Description
Keywords
Seio maxilar Implante dentário Enxerto ósseo Biomateriais Maxillary sinus Dental implants Bone grafting Biomaterials
