Loading...
Publication
Guided implant surgery, A to Z – a literature review
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPG_35151 | 596.53 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objetivo: Esta revisão sistemática visa comparar a cirurgia de implante guiada com a
convencional.
Métodos: A revisão foi realizada com uma pesquisa sistemática em várias bases de
dados, incluindo PubMed, OVID e Cochrane Library. Os estudos clínicos randomizados
sobre cirurgia de implante guiada, nos últimos dez anos, publicados em jornais de
medicina dentária, foram selecionados a partir de PubMed, OVID e Cochrane Library,
com os mesmos critérios.
Resultados: 19 artigos foram avaliados, comparando os resultados de protocolos
guiados e convencionais, durante a cirurgia de implantes. Os parâmetros clínicos
avaliados foram: precisão do implante, eficiência do tratamento, experiência do
cirurgião e satisfação do paciente.
Conclusões: Resultados promissores foram publicados recentemente sobre a cirurgia
de implante guiada. Diferenças significativas na colocação dos implantes foram
observadas dentro dos grupos, sendo a cirurgia guiada mais precisa do que o método
convencional.
Objective: The present systematic review aims to compare guided implant surgery with conventional implant surgery. Methods: This review was conducted through a systematic search in several databases, including PubMed, OVID and Cochrane Library. An electronic search on PubMed, reporting randomized clinical trials on guided implant surgery over the past ten years published in dental journal, were selected and supplemented by a research on OVID and Cochrane Library, using the same criteria. Results: 19 articles were assessed, comparing the outcomes of guided and conventional protocols, used in the treatment of implant surgery. The clinical parameters assessed were: accuracy of implant, efficiency of treatment, surgeon’s experience, and patient’s satisfaction. Conclusions: Promising results were published recently regarding the accuracy and effectiveness of guided implant surgery. Significant differences in implant placement were observed within groups, being guided surgery more accurate than the conventional method.
Objective: The present systematic review aims to compare guided implant surgery with conventional implant surgery. Methods: This review was conducted through a systematic search in several databases, including PubMed, OVID and Cochrane Library. An electronic search on PubMed, reporting randomized clinical trials on guided implant surgery over the past ten years published in dental journal, were selected and supplemented by a research on OVID and Cochrane Library, using the same criteria. Results: 19 articles were assessed, comparing the outcomes of guided and conventional protocols, used in the treatment of implant surgery. The clinical parameters assessed were: accuracy of implant, efficiency of treatment, surgeon’s experience, and patient’s satisfaction. Conclusions: Promising results were published recently regarding the accuracy and effectiveness of guided implant surgery. Significant differences in implant placement were observed within groups, being guided surgery more accurate than the conventional method.
Description
Keywords
Cirurgia guiada de implantes Cirurgia assistida por computador Método convencional Implantes dentários Guided implant surgery Computer-assisted surgery Conventional method Dental implants