Loading...
Publication
Taxas de sobrevivência de implantes: protocolos de carga diferida – revisão narrativa
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34991 | 674.86 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objetivo: analisar e comparar os protocolos de carga diferida em implantes dentários, com base nas taxas de sobrevivência e determinar, se possível, qual o tipo de reabilitação protética com menos taxas de complicação /fracasso (unitária, parcial e total). Métodos: foi elaborada uma pesquisa bibliográfica, com recurso à base de dados da MEDLINE (PubMed) e foram incluídos apenas artigos de revisão sistemática, estudos randomizados controlados e estudos prospetivos, cujos implantes fossem colocados em zonas cicatrizadas e sujeitos a protocolos de carga diferida. Resultados: foram obtidos 3 artigos e analisadas as taxas de sobrevivência de implantes para os diferentes tipos de reabilitações. Conclusões: foi possível alcançar taxas elevadas de sobrevivência de implantes com protocolos de carga diferida nos diferentes tipos de restauração protética (unitários, parciais e totais) em zonas cicatrizadas.
Objective: to analyze and compare delayed loading protocols for dental implants based on survival rates and to determine, if possible, which type of prosthetic rehabilitation has the lowest complication/failure rates (single, partial and total). Methods: a literature search was performed using the MEDLINE (PubMed) database and only systematic review, randomized controled trials and prospective studies were included, whose implants were placed in healed areas and subjected to delayed loading protocols. Results: 3 articles were obtained and implant survival rates were analyzed for the different types of rehabilitation. Conclusions: it was possible to achieve high implant survival rates with delayed loading protocols in different types of prosthetic restorations (single, partial and full) in healed areas.
Objective: to analyze and compare delayed loading protocols for dental implants based on survival rates and to determine, if possible, which type of prosthetic rehabilitation has the lowest complication/failure rates (single, partial and total). Methods: a literature search was performed using the MEDLINE (PubMed) database and only systematic review, randomized controled trials and prospective studies were included, whose implants were placed in healed areas and subjected to delayed loading protocols. Results: 3 articles were obtained and implant survival rates were analyzed for the different types of rehabilitation. Conclusions: it was possible to achieve high implant survival rates with delayed loading protocols in different types of prosthetic restorations (single, partial and full) in healed areas.
Description
Keywords
Long-term Survival rate Dental implants