Loading...
Publication
Substitutos ósseos xenógenos: Bio-Oss® versus Cerabone®
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 379.29 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objetivo: analisar e comparar os resultados de dois substitutos ósseos xenógenos, Bio-Oss® e Cerabone®, na colocação de implantes na maxila, recorrendo à elevação do seio maxilar e elevação do soalho do nariz. Métodos: realizou-se uma pesquisa bibliográfica, com recurso à base de dados PubMed e, seguindo as metodologias PICO e PRISMA (critérios de inclusão e exclusão). Inicialmente, a pesquisa foi limitada a RCTs, não existindo artigos disponíveis, o âmbito foi alargado a revisões e a estudos clínicos. Resultados: foram obtidos e analisados onze estudos comparando a regeneração óssea de duas marcas comerciais de substitutos ósseos xenógenos. Os parâmetros clínicos neles avaliados foram descritos. Conclusões: poucos são os estudos atualmente disponíveis que comparam de forma efetiva Bio-Oss® e Cerabone®, sendo estes restritos às elevações de seios maxilares e do soalho nasal.
Objective: to analyze and compare the results of two xenogenic bone substitutes, Bio-Oss® and Cerabone®, in the placement of implants in the maxilla, using maxillary sinus elevation and nasal floor elevation. Methods: a bibliographic search was performed, using the PubMed database, and following the PICO and PRISMA methodologies (inclusion and exclusion criteria). Initially, research was limited to RCTs, but since no articles were available, the scope had to be extended to reviews and clinical studies. Results: eleven studies comparing bone regeneration of two trademarks of xenogenic bone substitutes were obtained and analyzed. The clinical parameters evaluated were described. Conclusions: currently, there are few available studies that effectively compare Bio-Oss® and Cerabone®, which are restricted to maxillary sinus and nasal floor elevations.
Objective: to analyze and compare the results of two xenogenic bone substitutes, Bio-Oss® and Cerabone®, in the placement of implants in the maxilla, using maxillary sinus elevation and nasal floor elevation. Methods: a bibliographic search was performed, using the PubMed database, and following the PICO and PRISMA methodologies (inclusion and exclusion criteria). Initially, research was limited to RCTs, but since no articles were available, the scope had to be extended to reviews and clinical studies. Results: eleven studies comparing bone regeneration of two trademarks of xenogenic bone substitutes were obtained and analyzed. The clinical parameters evaluated were described. Conclusions: currently, there are few available studies that effectively compare Bio-Oss® and Cerabone®, which are restricted to maxillary sinus and nasal floor elevations.
Description
Keywords
Substitutos ósseos Xenoenxertos Mineral de osso bovino desproteinizado Bio-Oss® Cerabone® Elevação do seio maxilar Elevação de soalho nasal Bone substitutes Xenograft Deproteinized bovine bone mineral Maxillary sinus lift Nasal floor elevation