Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
423.58 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A planificação em Prostodontia fixa é essencial para a otimização do resultado do tratamento. Durante vários anos foi utilizado o planeamento convencional, sendo recentemente integradas ferramentas de planeamento digital nesta fase do tratamento reabilitador.
Foi efetuada uma revisão de literatura narrativa comparando o planeamento convencional e o virtual no contexto da Prostodontia fixa.
A pesquisa bibliográfica foi realizada na PubMed/Medline, GoogleScholar e Quintessence Publisihing. Foram estabelecidos critérios de inclusão e exclusão, considerando apenas os estudos em que foram utilizados dentes naturais entre os anos 2012 e 2021.
Não é possível assumir uma conclusão irrefutável face à escassez de estudos que comparam de forma científica o planeamento convencional versus o virtual. Contudo, existem vantagens na utilização de ferramentas virtuais (ou mistas, entre convencionais e digitais). Trata-se de uma área de investigação onde serão necessários mais estudos para compreender a evidência científica.
Treatment planning in fixed Prosthodontics is essential to optimize the final result. Initially done with conventional planning, recently digital planning tools have been integrated in this phase of rehabilitation treatment. A narrative literature review was done to compare conventional and virtual planning in the context of fixed Prosthodontics. A bibliographical search was done in PubMed/Medline, GoogleScholar and Quintessence Publishing. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established, considering only studies in which natural teeth were used between the years 2012 and 2021. It is not possible to assume an irrefutable conclusion due to the lack of studies that scientifically compare conventional versus virtual planning. However, there are advantages with virtual tools (or mixed, between conventional and digital). As such, this is an important area of research where more studies are needed for a better understanding of the scientific evidence.
Treatment planning in fixed Prosthodontics is essential to optimize the final result. Initially done with conventional planning, recently digital planning tools have been integrated in this phase of rehabilitation treatment. A narrative literature review was done to compare conventional and virtual planning in the context of fixed Prosthodontics. A bibliographical search was done in PubMed/Medline, GoogleScholar and Quintessence Publishing. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established, considering only studies in which natural teeth were used between the years 2012 and 2021. It is not possible to assume an irrefutable conclusion due to the lack of studies that scientifically compare conventional versus virtual planning. However, there are advantages with virtual tools (or mixed, between conventional and digital). As such, this is an important area of research where more studies are needed for a better understanding of the scientific evidence.
Description
Keywords
Planeamento convencional Planeamento digital Planeamento virtual Medicina dentária digital Fluxo de trabalho digital Desenho digital odontológico Desenho virtual do sorriso Biomimética Digital planning Virtual planning Digital dental medicine Digital workflow Dental digital design Virtual smile design Biomimetics