Loading...
Publication
ReabilitaĆ§Ć£o sobre implantes - aparafusada versus cimentada
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPG_27715 | 689.83 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Hoje em dia os implantes sĆ£o a primeira escolha para as reabilitaƧƵes de prĆ³tese fixa, dependendo sempre da disponibilidade Ć³ssea do paciente. O mĆ©dico dentista deve escolher o dispositivo protĆ©tico mais adequado para colocar sobre o implante, que apresente a maior retenĆ§Ć£o possĆvel. Assim sobre implantes podem-se distinguir dois sistemas de reabilitaĆ§Ć£o: as coroas cimentadas e as coroas aparafusadas e Ć© parte das competĆŖncias do MĆ©dico Dentista a escolha entre um sistema ou outro.
O objectivo deste trabalho serĆ” fazer uma breve revisĆ£o sobre as principais vantagens e desvantagens de cada um destes sistemas, sob o ponto de vista estĆ©tico, da retenĆ§Ć£o, das fraturas, dos hĆ”bitos parafuncionais, dos efeitos no periodonto, funcional e biolĆ³gico. Para isso foi realizada uma pesquisa bibliografica das principais referĆŖncias cientificas com as seguintes palavras-chave: Coroas sobre implante; PrĆ³tese aparafusada; PrĆ³tese cimentada; EstĆ©tica; OclusĆ£o; RetenĆ§Ć£o.
Today, implants are the first choice for fixed prosthesis rehabilitation, always depending on the patient's bone availability. The dentist must choose the most suitable prosthetic device to place on the implant, which has the greatest possible retention. Thus, two rehabilitation systems can be distinguished on implants: the cemented crowns and the screw-retained crowns, and it is part of the dentist's competence to choose between one system or another. The aim of this work will be to briefly review the main advantages and disadvantages of each of these systems, from an aesthetic, retention, fracture, parafunctional habits, periodontal, functional and biological point of view. For this, a bibliographic search was carried out for the main scientific references and the following keywords: Crowns on implants; Screw-retained prostheses; Cemented prostheses; Aesthetics; Occlusion; Retention.
Today, implants are the first choice for fixed prosthesis rehabilitation, always depending on the patient's bone availability. The dentist must choose the most suitable prosthetic device to place on the implant, which has the greatest possible retention. Thus, two rehabilitation systems can be distinguished on implants: the cemented crowns and the screw-retained crowns, and it is part of the dentist's competence to choose between one system or another. The aim of this work will be to briefly review the main advantages and disadvantages of each of these systems, from an aesthetic, retention, fracture, parafunctional habits, periodontal, functional and biological point of view. For this, a bibliographic search was carried out for the main scientific references and the following keywords: Crowns on implants; Screw-retained prostheses; Cemented prostheses; Aesthetics; Occlusion; Retention.
Description
Keywords
Coroas sobre implante PrĆ³tese aparafusada PrĆ³tese cimentada EstĆ©tica OclusĆ£o RetenĆ§Ć£o Crowns on implants Screw-retained prostheses Cemented prostheses Aesthetics Occlusion Retention