Loading...
Publication
Obturação com cimento biocerâmico em endodontia: revisão narrativa
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34968 | 331.68 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objetivos: Visar a comparação de cimentos convencionais com cimentos biocerâmicos, assim como a comparação destes últimos entre si. Abordar-se-ão as características físico-químicas, funcionais, capacidades antibacterianas e de indução regenerativa dos cimentos Portland®, MTA®, Biodentine®, AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer®, Endosequence BC Sealer®, MTA Fillapex®.
Materiais e Métodos: Realizou-se uma pesquisa bibliográfica, de março de 2022 até novembro de 2023, nos motores de busca Pubmed e Google Scholar.
Resultados: Consultou-se um total de 370 artigos, selecionando-se 62 e 2 links. Neste estudo percebeu-se os cimentos biocerâmicos serem frequentes no tratamento endodôntico devido à sua biocompatibilidade e capacidade de selamento aprimoradas. A composição à base de silicatos e outros minerais permite que estes forneçam excelentes níveis de selamento e adesão às superfícies dentinárias, com absorção apical mínima.
Conclusão: Verificou-se os cimentos biocerâmicos serem mais eficazes no selamento, apresentarem melhor biocompatibilidade, serem melhores promotores de biomineralização, demonstrarem resultados mais satisfatórios, sendo mais facilmente manipulados.
Objectives: This review aims to compare conventional cements with bioceramic cements, and to compare the latter with each other. The physical-chemical, functional characteristics, antibacterial capabilities and regenerative induction capacity of cements will be addressed about: Portland cement®, MTA®, Biodentine®, AH Plus Bioceramic®, Endosequence BC Sealer®, MTA Fillapex®. Materials and Methods: A bibliographical search carried out, between march 2022 and november 2023, in the Pubmed and Google Scholar search engines. Results: 370 articles consulted and 62 were selected besides 2 links. Bioceramic cements are common in endodontic treatment due to their improved biocompatibility and sealing capacity. With a composition based on silicates and other minerals, it allows them to provide excellent levels of sealing and adhesion to dentin surfaces, with minimal apical absorption. Conclusion: Bioceramic cements are more effective in terms of sealing capacity, have better biocompatibility, are better promoters of biomineralization, demonstrate more satisfactory results and are more easily manipulated.
Objectives: This review aims to compare conventional cements with bioceramic cements, and to compare the latter with each other. The physical-chemical, functional characteristics, antibacterial capabilities and regenerative induction capacity of cements will be addressed about: Portland cement®, MTA®, Biodentine®, AH Plus Bioceramic®, Endosequence BC Sealer®, MTA Fillapex®. Materials and Methods: A bibliographical search carried out, between march 2022 and november 2023, in the Pubmed and Google Scholar search engines. Results: 370 articles consulted and 62 were selected besides 2 links. Bioceramic cements are common in endodontic treatment due to their improved biocompatibility and sealing capacity. With a composition based on silicates and other minerals, it allows them to provide excellent levels of sealing and adhesion to dentin surfaces, with minimal apical absorption. Conclusion: Bioceramic cements are more effective in terms of sealing capacity, have better biocompatibility, are better promoters of biomineralization, demonstrate more satisfactory results and are more easily manipulated.
Description
Keywords
Bioceramic sealer Bioceramic cement Filling retro-obturation Root canal system Tridimensional obturation