Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
268.95 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objetivos: O objetivo deste trabalho será realizar uma revisão narrativa, pretendendo comparar os resultados de PRF+CAF e PRF+CTG para o recobrimento radicular das revisões gengivais.
Metodologia: Foi realizada uma pesquisa bibliográfica eletrónica através de dados Pub MED. A pesquisa foi efetuada até fevereiro de 2021 (256 artigos iniciais), tendo sido aplicados critérios de inclusão e de exclusão, nomeadamente com publicação < 5 anos e estudos relevantes em inglês, resultando um total de 189 artigos.
Resultados: Da pesquisa bibliográfica após a aplicação dos critérios de inclusão/exclusão resultaram 5 artigos, que demonstraram ambas as técnicas usadas no recobrimento de recessões gengivais, bem como, os seus resultados clínicos, tendo estes sido analisados à posteriori.
Conclusão: Aquando da aplicação da técnica de CAF+PRF obtiveram-se resultados clínicos favoráveis, sendo uma alternativa bastante promissora, nomeadamente, no que concerne ao quadro clínico pós-cirúrgico. No caso da técnica CAF+CTG, esta continua a ser o gold standard no recobrimento radicular propriamente dito, pela sua previsibilidade de resultados finais.
Goals: The objective of this work will be to carry out a narrative review, intending to compare the results of PRF+CAF and PRF+CTG for root coverage of gingival revisions. Methodology: An electronic bibliographic search was carried out using PubMed data, using the following keywords: gingival recession and platelet rich fibrin and connective tissue. The research was carried out until February 2021 (229 initial articles), and inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, namely with publication <5 years and relevant studies in English, resulting in a total of 164 articles. Results: The literature search after the application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria resulted in 5 articles, which demonstrated both techniques used in the covering of gingival recessions, as well as their clinical results, which were analyzed a posteriori. Conclusion: When applying the CAF+PRF technique, favorable clinical results were obtained, being a very promising alternative, namely, with regard to the postsurgical clinical picture. In the case of the CAF+CTG technique, this continues to be the golden standard in root coverage itself, due to its predictability of final results.
Goals: The objective of this work will be to carry out a narrative review, intending to compare the results of PRF+CAF and PRF+CTG for root coverage of gingival revisions. Methodology: An electronic bibliographic search was carried out using PubMed data, using the following keywords: gingival recession and platelet rich fibrin and connective tissue. The research was carried out until February 2021 (229 initial articles), and inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, namely with publication <5 years and relevant studies in English, resulting in a total of 164 articles. Results: The literature search after the application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria resulted in 5 articles, which demonstrated both techniques used in the covering of gingival recessions, as well as their clinical results, which were analyzed a posteriori. Conclusion: When applying the CAF+PRF technique, favorable clinical results were obtained, being a very promising alternative, namely, with regard to the postsurgical clinical picture. In the case of the CAF+CTG technique, this continues to be the golden standard in root coverage itself, due to its predictability of final results.
Description
Keywords
Gingival recession Platelet rich fibrin Connective tissue