Loading...
Publication
Impressões digitais versus analógicas no planeamento reabilitador: revisão narrativa
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31099 | 557.39 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objetivo: Uma comparação entre a utilização dos sistemas digitais de impressões orais (Scanners intraorais) e técnicas convencionais de impressão intraoral no planeamento de tratamentos reabilitadores.
Materiais e Metodologia: Foram realizadas pesquisas nas seguintes bases de dados: Pubmed, Biomed e Elsevier, tendo sido encontrados 88 artigos referentes ao tema, sendo que foram utilizados 19 destes na produção desta revisão bibliográfica.
Resultados: Na comparação entre as duas técnicas de impressões orais, foi notável a existência de vantagens em cada uma delas e suas as diferenças não invalidam nenhuma delas.
Conclusões: Apesar das técnicas digitais de impressões orais apresentarem vantagens significativas, é ainda necessário maior desenvolvimento nesta área para que a substituição das técnicas convencionais seja definitiva.
Objectives: A comparison between the usage of digital technologies (intraoral scanners) and conventional techniques for intraoral impression, focused on the planning of rehabilitation treatments, will be made. Materials and Methodology: The databases of Pubmed, Biomed e Elsevier were used to research and compile a list of 88 articles among which 19 were used to produce this literature review. Results: In the comparison between both techniques, it is noticeable the advantages of each one and the differences don’t discard any of them as a viable option. Conclusions: Although the digital impressions presente significant advantages, it is still required that more advances are made on this technologie for the conventional techniques to be replaced.
Objectives: A comparison between the usage of digital technologies (intraoral scanners) and conventional techniques for intraoral impression, focused on the planning of rehabilitation treatments, will be made. Materials and Methodology: The databases of Pubmed, Biomed e Elsevier were used to research and compile a list of 88 articles among which 19 were used to produce this literature review. Results: In the comparison between both techniques, it is noticeable the advantages of each one and the differences don’t discard any of them as a viable option. Conclusions: Although the digital impressions presente significant advantages, it is still required that more advances are made on this technologie for the conventional techniques to be replaced.
Description
Keywords
Impressões digitais Impressões convencionais Planeamento Vantagens e desvantagens Scanner intraoral Workflow digital Material de impressão Perceção do paciente Digital impression Conventional impression Planning Advantages and disadvantages Intraoral scanner Digital workflow Patient perception