| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.17 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Introdução: Quando o tratamento Endodôntico não-cirúrgico não atinge os resultados desejados ou não é possível de realizar, existe a necessidade de abordar o sistema de canais radiculares recorrendo à cirurgia Endodôntica.
Objetivos: O objetivo desta revisão é analisar os materiais retro-obturadores disponíveis no mercado e relacioná-los com o sucesso do tratamento Endodôntico cirúrgico. Foi também feita uma revisão sobre as técnicas usadas na cirurgia Endodôntica.
Materiais e Métodos: Foi realizada uma revisão bibliográfica baseada na informação obtida por pesquisa on-line de artigos indexados.
Resultados: Em relação ao outcome, biocompatibilidade e capacidade de selamento, o material mais estudado e com melhores resultados é o MTA, sendo que outros materiais biocerâmicos também apresentaram bons resultados como materiais de retro-obturação.
Conclusão: A técnica microcirurgia é muito mais previsível e conservadora quando comparada com a técnica cirúrgica. Os cimentos biocerâmicos apresentam inúmeras vantagens como materiais de retro-obturação, sendo o MTA o mais consensual.
Introduction: When non-surgical Endodontic treatment does not achieve the desired results or isn’t possible to perform, there is a need to approach the root system using Endodontic surgery. Objectives: The aim of this review is to analyze the retro-filling materials available on the market and relate them to the success of surgical Endodontic treatment. In addition to this main objective, a review of the techniques used in Endodontic surgery was carried out. Materials and Methods: A literature review was performed based on information obtained from an online research. Results: Regarding outcome, biocompatibility and sealing ability, the most studied material with the best results is MTA, though other bioceramic materials also showed good results as retrofilling materials. Conclusion: The microsurgical technique is much more predictable and conservative when compared to the surgical technique. Bioceramic cements have numerous advantages as retrofilling materials, with MTA being the most consensual.
Introduction: When non-surgical Endodontic treatment does not achieve the desired results or isn’t possible to perform, there is a need to approach the root system using Endodontic surgery. Objectives: The aim of this review is to analyze the retro-filling materials available on the market and relate them to the success of surgical Endodontic treatment. In addition to this main objective, a review of the techniques used in Endodontic surgery was carried out. Materials and Methods: A literature review was performed based on information obtained from an online research. Results: Regarding outcome, biocompatibility and sealing ability, the most studied material with the best results is MTA, though other bioceramic materials also showed good results as retrofilling materials. Conclusion: The microsurgical technique is much more predictable and conservative when compared to the surgical technique. Bioceramic cements have numerous advantages as retrofilling materials, with MTA being the most consensual.
Description
Keywords
Endodontic surgery Apical surgery Retrofilling materials Retrograde filling materials
