| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.23 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
O tratamento endodôntico não cirúrgico é composto por três etapas: a instrumentação, a irrigação e a obturação. A obturação é um processo que tem como objetivo selar de forma tridimensional o complexo sistema de canais da peça dentária.
A realização deste trabalho tem como objectivo efectuar uma revisão narrativa da literatura para analisar e comparar duas técnicas de obturação: a Onda Contínua de calor e a Carrier Based, comparando a efetividade, vantagens e d esvantagens de cada técnica reportadas na literatura científica atual.
Como resultado desta análise, compreendemos que não existe diferença significativa entre o sucesso das duas técnicas de obturação, mas que possuem limites de utilização a ter em conta, tais como certas características de anatomia dentária ou o risco de extrusão de material de obturação.
Assim, a escolha de uma técnica ou de outra pelo profissional de saúde dependerá de fatores anatómicos e de particularidades de cada caso clínico.
Non surgical endodontic treatment consists of three steps: instrumentation, irrigation, and obturation. The obturation is a process that aims to seal in a three dimensional way the complex canal system of the tooth. The aim of this work is to perform a narrative review of the literature to analyze and compare two filling techniques: Continuous Heat Wave and Carrier Based, comparing the effectiveness, advantages and disadvantages of each technique reported in the current scientific literature. As a result of this analysis, we understand that there is no significant difference between the success of the two filling techniques, but that they have limits of use to be taken into account, such as certain characteristics of dental anatomy or the risk of extrusion of filling material. Thus, the choice of one technique or the other by the health professional will depend on anatomical factors and particularities of each clinical case.
Non surgical endodontic treatment consists of three steps: instrumentation, irrigation, and obturation. The obturation is a process that aims to seal in a three dimensional way the complex canal system of the tooth. The aim of this work is to perform a narrative review of the literature to analyze and compare two filling techniques: Continuous Heat Wave and Carrier Based, comparing the effectiveness, advantages and disadvantages of each technique reported in the current scientific literature. As a result of this analysis, we understand that there is no significant difference between the success of the two filling techniques, but that they have limits of use to be taken into account, such as certain characteristics of dental anatomy or the risk of extrusion of filling material. Thus, the choice of one technique or the other by the health professional will depend on anatomical factors and particularities of each clinical case.
Description
Keywords
System B Obturação endodôntica Guta percha termoplástica Carrier based Onda contínua de calor Microinfiltração System B Endodontic obturation Thermoplastic gutta percha Carrier based Continuous heat wave Microinfiltration
