Loading...
Publication
O impacto do uso das medidas preventivas durante a pandemia COVID-19 na segurança dos profissionais de saúde: scoping review
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35174 | 410 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Introdução: Em janeiro de 2020, a COVID-19, doença causada pelo novo Coronavírus (SARS-CoV-2), foi considerada uma emergência de saúde pública internacional em março do mesmo ano, a Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS) declara a pandemia, levando a importantes mudanças nas condições de trabalho, na saúde e segurança dos profissionais de saúde (PS) e doentes.
Objectivo: identificar as evidências científicas sobre o impacto do uso das medidas preventivas (MP) durante a pandemia Covid-19 na segurança dos PS.
As seguintes bases de dados utilizadas foram: MEDLINE (via PUBMED), PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES COLLECTION, LILACS (via BVS), SCIELO PT, BDENF (via BVS) e SCIENCE DIRECT.
Método: scoping review, pesquisa realizada em dezembro de 2022 nos idiomas inglês, português e espanhol no espaço temporal de dois anos segundo a metodologia de Joanna Briggs, Briggs Institute. Foram considerados estudos experimentais, quase experimentais, observacionais, prospectivos e retrospectivos, estudos de caso e estudos qualitativos descritivos, estudos fenomenológicos e etnográficos, investigação-ação e revisões da literatura.
Resultados: Foram identificados 4009 estudos, dos quais 11 foram selecionados. Os estudos selecionados demonstraram que o acesso aos equipamentos de proteção individual (EPI 's) foi escasso, alguns eram de má qualidade e a sua utilização foi inadequada. A reutilização dos EPI’s em alguns casos levou ao aumento do risco de contaminação e a sua utilização prolongada causou reações adversas.
Conclusão: O uso das MP por parte dos PS e a segurança dos doentes são de responsabilidade dos gestores hospitalares, PS e doentes, pois todos beneficiam do controlo da infeção por COVID-19.
Introduction: In January 2020, COVID-19, a disease caused by the new Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), was considered an international public health emergency and, in March of the same year, declared a pandemic by the World Health Organisation (WHO), leading to important changes in the working conditions, health and safety of HCWs and patients. Objective: to identify the scientific evidence on the impact of the use of preventive measures (PM) during the Covid-19 pandemic on the safety of HCWs. The following databases were used: MEDLINE (via PUBMED), PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES COLLECTION, LILACS (via BVS), SCIELO EN, BDENF (via BVS) and SCIENCE DIRECT. Method: scoping review, research conducted in December 2022 in English, Portuguese and Spanish in a time span of twelve years according to the methodology of Joanna Briggs, Briggs Institute. Experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, prospective and retrospective studies, case studies and descriptive qualitative studies, phenomenological and ethnographic studies, action research and literature reviews were considered. Results: A total of 4009 studies were identified, of which 11 were selected. The selected studies showed that access to personal protective equipment (PPE) was scarce, some were of poor quality and their use was inadequate. Reuse of PPE in some cases led to increased risk of contamination and prolonged use caused adverse reactions. Conclusion: The use of SPs by HCWs and patient safety are the responsibility of hospital managers, HCWs and patients, as everyone benefits from COVID-19 infection control.
Introduction: In January 2020, COVID-19, a disease caused by the new Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), was considered an international public health emergency and, in March of the same year, declared a pandemic by the World Health Organisation (WHO), leading to important changes in the working conditions, health and safety of HCWs and patients. Objective: to identify the scientific evidence on the impact of the use of preventive measures (PM) during the Covid-19 pandemic on the safety of HCWs. The following databases were used: MEDLINE (via PUBMED), PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES COLLECTION, LILACS (via BVS), SCIELO EN, BDENF (via BVS) and SCIENCE DIRECT. Method: scoping review, research conducted in December 2022 in English, Portuguese and Spanish in a time span of twelve years according to the methodology of Joanna Briggs, Briggs Institute. Experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, prospective and retrospective studies, case studies and descriptive qualitative studies, phenomenological and ethnographic studies, action research and literature reviews were considered. Results: A total of 4009 studies were identified, of which 11 were selected. The selected studies showed that access to personal protective equipment (PPE) was scarce, some were of poor quality and their use was inadequate. Reuse of PPE in some cases led to increased risk of contamination and prolonged use caused adverse reactions. Conclusion: The use of SPs by HCWs and patient safety are the responsibility of hospital managers, HCWs and patients, as everyone benefits from COVID-19 infection control.
Description
Projeto de Graduação apresentado à Universidade Fernando Pessoa para obtenção do grau de Licenciada em Enfermagem
Keywords
Medidas padrão de segurança Profissionais de saúde COVID-19 Standard safety measures Healthcare professionals