Silva, Pedro J.2020-07-242020-07-242020http://hdl.handle.net/10284/8815Recent publications have questioned the appropriateness of the chemiosmotic theory, a key tenet of modern bioenergetics originally described by Mitchell and since widely improved upon and applied. In one of them, application of Gauss’ law to a model charge distribution in mitochondria was argued to refute the possibility of ATP generation through H+ movement in the absence of a counterion, whereas a different author advocated, for other reasons, the impossibility of chemiosmosis and proposed that a novel energy-generation scheme (referred to as “murburn”) relying on superoxide-catalyzed (or superoxide-promoted) ADP phosphorylation would operate instead. In this letter, those proposals are critically examined and found to be inconsistent with established experimental data and new theoretical calculations.engBioenergeticsChemiosmosisGauss’s lawProton-motive forceChemiosmotic misunderstandingsjournal article10.1016/j.bpc.2020.106424